Van Til doing some street preaching

First a little recap

The first post in my series addressed what I believe is a creeping malaise infecting presuppositionalism. I believe the apologetic is soundly biblical and the most effective for engaging unbelievers. However, it has been my observation that presuppositional advocates make the methodology much more difficult to utilize than it ought to be. In my opinion, if an apologetic system can’t be quickly learned by the simplest of lay people, the presenter needs to identify the inherent flaws in his presentation.

In my second post, I began outlining what I believe are essential theological talking points we must have in our minds as we prepare ourselves to engage unbelievers.

Now I want to move our theology from the realm of the theoretical, to the daily practical. My intention is not to provide a “silver bullet” technique for evangelism – honestly, none exist. I believe each encounter is unique, and it has been my experience that God’s Spirit often uses unexpected avenues to draw a sinner’s heart to Christ.

Also, I am not necessarily advocating against the use of Evangelism Explosion, or the Way of the Master, or Greg Koukl’s Tactics, or any number of evangelistic methods. They have their place and can be useful if done so in a manner faithful to the text of Scripture.

My main objective with this post will be to examine two broad, and vitally important areas for Christians when using their apologetic theology in their evangelistic encounters.

Effective evangelism must begin with the Christian’s character

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how passionate a person is for the Gospel or how persuasive his arguments may be for the Christian faith. What truly matters is his character. If the person’s character does not reflect the transforming power of the Lord and Savior he proclaims, he only heaps to himself scorn and contempt.

I cannot stress that point enough to the reader.

First Peter 3:15-17 is one of the key passages on apologetics. Rather than presenting a series of airtight philosophical arguments for apologetic methodology, Peter instead focuses our attention upon the personal conduct of the apologist. He addresses the attitudes that shape his overall moral life.

Notice how Peter writes that our “defense of the faith” is to be made with “meekness and fear.” Some translations translate Peter’s words as “gentleness and respect.” That speaks to personal heart issues that are put on display for the watching world. There is nothing about our ability to make persuasive arguments.

The effectiveness of your apologetic evangelism will stand or fall upon your character. If your life does not show the unbeliever who you claim Jesus is, no amount of apologetic argument will matter.

You may have a sharp intellect. Your knowledge may have the ability to shut the mouths of even the loudest atheist. But if you’re a person who is known as a hot head, who easily becomes belligerent in a conversation, or a single young man or lady with a flirtatious reputation, or a husband who has a strained relationship with his wife and kids, no one is going to care a lick about what you’re telling them about Jesus. Even the most hardened skeptic understands Christianity is about personal, holy conduct. If your conduct doesn’t reflect godliness, even in the little things, they’ll shut you off.

We are engaging the unbeliever’s entire way of life with the whole message of the biblical Christian faith

When we speak with our unbelieving neighbors, friends, and relatives about the Gospel, we are not giving them one more opinion to consider among a group of similar opinions. In other words, you are not convincing the person why he should make chocolate-chip his favorite cookie.

That is the major deficiency with the classical Thomism influencing popular apologetics among evangelicals. There is a tendency to make the Christian faith a choice between cookies or flavors of ice cream. “Hey, you ought to try this! I think you will probably find it much more flavorful than your banana chocolate chunk.” They also limit the use of the Bible in their presentations. There is time for the Bible later. Besides, they may argue, it’s not proper to prove the legitimacy of the Christian faith with the Bible.

What a cheap, shameful way to think about the power of God.

No. When we evangelize, we bring the truth of the Christian worldview as it is relayed in the Gospel message against everything the unbeliever holds dear in his heart as true. We are basically telling that person that everything he believes about God, faith, religion, and the meaning of life is wrong. Not just mistaken, but soul-damning, fatally wrong.

In 2 Corinthians 10:5, Paul describes the unbeliever as exalting his knowledge over the knowledge of God. Unbelievers just don’t hold a few errant facts about Jesus that are easily correctable. Scripture proclaims to us that he lives in perpetual rebellion against God’s authority and laws. That is what Paul means when he says the unbeliever exalts his knowledge over that knowledge of God revealed to us in Scripture.

Moreover, he isn’t accidentally mistaken, either. In fact, the unbeliever exalts his knowledge willfully, cheerfully, and often with a full-throated understanding of what he is doing even if it is irrational and perhaps puts his life at great risk.

The goal of our evangelistic efforts is to show the unbeliever that his “exalted” knowledge is an offense to a Holy God. You tell him he is justly condemned by God. You then proclaim to him how God in His grace made a way to be made right with Him through Christ. We then tell that person to put away those cherished heart commitments, that heart of rebellion exalting his knowledge above God’s, and embrace Christ and His lordship.

Our evangelistic message is truly that simple. In fact, it’s the reason why the world hates Jesus and Christians. They certainly hate righteousness, and seriously dislike having their true self exposed in the light of God’s Word. In short, people hate the notion of someone telling them their thinking about life is wrong.

Is that it?

At this point, I can imagine many folks, having read over my words, will now ask, “Is that it?” “Aren’t you being a bit too simplistic?” “I mean, where does TAG come in?” “The laws of logic?” “Moral absolutes?” “Greg Bahnsen?”

Just so I am clear: I am not saying those things are unimportant. I expect Christians as they grow in their knowledge of Christ to also grow in the knowledge of their faith. That implies growth in their knowledge of apologetics and the ability to engage and answer the objectors to their faith. Christians should want to know how to answer the objections of that skeptical cousin they only see at Thanksgiving. They should want to help college kids grapple with challenges to their faith from bitter atheistic community college instructors. What we know about the history of our Bible and theological theodicy can be important, as well as useful.

Always remember: our working knowledge of apologetic proofs are NOT the power of God unto salvation. Philosophical arguments and historical evidences add nothing to the Gospel. We don’t want to merely win an argument with a mean-spirited evolutionist. We want to win a soul to Christ. Only the power of the Gospel can do that.

What then do we do with our understanding of these two broad areas? Where does the rubber meet the road, as it were?

This is where we as Christians take those points I systematized in my second post, and formulate an evangelistic outline to engage unbelievers. We ask them questions. Force them to defend their claims they make against our faith. Challenge them to defend their personal beliefs. Demonstrate to them the folly of their unbelief and rebellion against their Creator. And God willing, tell them about what Jesus did.

There isn’t a “one size fits all” approach. Each person will be different. Each situation will be different. What may be an effective approach for one person may not go so well with another.

Our approaches may be different between individuals and situations. The one thing for certain, however, is the biblical theology that shapes our apologetic methodology. Our theology will provide the apologetic anchors for any Christian, regardless of spiritual maturity and educational background, to use for effective evangelism.


Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2022 Bible Thumping Wingnut Network


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?