Podcast (btwnoriginal): Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:59:21 — 109.3MB) | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS
This episode of the LBM podcast is a previously recorded dialogue between Tyler Vela and Jason Mullett on their respective views of the Genesis 1 text. Tyler defends his view that he names A Historical-Grammatical and Polemical Reading of Genesis 1 and Jason holds to the standard YEC (Young Earth Creation) model of Genesis 1. Be ready for a lively discussion.
Article: http://www.charismanews.com/us/54097-50-reasons-why-i-don-t-drink This post is for a Biblical response to an article written by Jamie Morgan on the Charisma News...
Jason first goes through the Bible and demonstrates that regeneration precedes faith. Faith and believing in Jesus is the...
In this episode Jason does a review and critique of Kevin Thompson’s video “Predestination: It’s Nothing Like You Were...
Description: In this episode Jason delves into an article entitled Practical Implications of Calvinism by Albert N. Martin. This...
Description: This episode is a sermon by Jason Mullett preached June 9th, 2019 at Bethel Community Church located in...
Description: In this episode Larry Wessel’s from Christian Answers TV joins us to discuss the Seventh Day Adventist groups....
Description: In this episode Jason Mullett and Dr. Leighton Flowers debate the topic of Libertarian Free Will. Jason denies...
Description: In this episode Jason reviewed NT Wright’s statements about a Christian Epistemology at the Veritas Forum. After that...
©2021 Bible Thumping Wingnut Network
Hey guys I was thinking about what you were talking about and taking Genesis 1 as God just differentiating light and darkness and then later on in Genesis differentiating signs and markers for day and night.
I don’t think you have to equate Genesis 1 with day. As Tyler seems to be doing.
The expression let there be light and the separation of light and darkness is a revelation of creative action taken by God in the formless void which I would assume to be Darkness.